Thoughtful Thursday
“Good thinking is as much a matter of disposition as it is of skill.”
~Shari Tishman
We spend a great deal of time in education teaching students how to think.
We teach them to analyze, compare, question, interpret, evaluate, and draw conclusions. We create lessons that require critical thinking, design assessments that measure it, and develop rubrics to describe what it looks like.
We place considerable emphasis on whether students can think critically.
I wonder how often we consider whether they are inclined to do so.
A meaningful difference exists between possessing a skill and having the disposition to use it.
A student may know how to ask thoughtful questions without being particularly curious. Another may understand how to evaluate evidence but rarely question information presented as fact. A student might demonstrate exceptional reasoning during a classroom assignment and then make decisions outside the classroom without applying any of that same thinking.
The skill exists. The disposition has not necessarily developed alongside it.
Shari Tishman's words remind us that teaching students how to think is only part of our responsibility. We must also help them develop the inclination to think.
That requires something more than instructional strategies.
It requires learning environments where curiosity is welcomed, uncertainty is comfortable enough to explore, and questioning is interpreted as intellectual engagement rather than defiance.
It requires adults who model how to reconsider an opinion, acknowledge incomplete understanding, and stay open to perspectives that challenge their own.
It requires giving students opportunities to make decisions, encounter complexity, and recognize that thoughtful consideration has value beyond earning a grade.
The same principle extends to educators and leaders.
We can participate in professional learning about reflective practice without becoming reflective practitioners. We can learn collaborative protocols without developing a genuine disposition toward collaboration. We can articulate the importance of inquiry while remaining uncomfortable when someone questions our own thinking.
Knowing how to do something does not mean we have made it part of how we approach the world.
Perhaps that is one of the most important distinctions we should make when we talk about educational outcomes.
Are we developing students who can demonstrate thinking when a teacher asks them to? Or are we developing people who are curious enough to ask questions without being prompted, thoughtful enough to consider another perspective, and confident enough to change their minds when new understanding emerges?
The ultimate goal is not simply to produce evidence of thinking within the classroom. It is to cultivate the kind of thinking students choose to carry beyond it.
That is where a skill becomes a disposition, and where education begins to influence far more than the lessons we teach.
Comments